Re: [GIT PULL] selftest: Add futex functional tests

[Darren Hart]

On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 10:37:51AM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 03/31/2015 10:24 AM, Darren Hart wrote:
> > On 3/31/15, 8:32 AM, "Shuah Khan" <shuahkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> >> Hi Daren,
> >>
> >> On 03/27/2015 04:17 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
> >>> Hi Shuah,
> >>>
> >>> This series begins the process of migrating my futextest tests into
> >>> kselftest.
> >>> I've started with only the functional tests, as the performance and
> >>> stress may
> >>> not be appropriate for kselftest as they stand.
> >>>
> >>> I cleaned up various complaints from checkpatch, but I ignored others
> >>> that would
> >>> require significant rework of the testcases, such as not using volatile
> >>> and not
> >>> creating new typedefs.
> >>>
> >>> The patches will follow, but I'm providing a pull request for your
> >>> convenience
> >>> as well.
> >>
> >> Thanks for acting on this so quickly after we talked about it at ELC.
> >> Just a quick note that I am going to get to this soon once I get the
> >> 4.1 content wrapped up. We can plan upon getting these into 4.2.
> > 
> > OK. Michael E. provided some feedback which I can either incorporate and
> > respin, or I can send as a follow-on to your -next after you merge these.
> > Which do you prefer?
> > 

...

> You can wait to re-do patches. I am planning to review the
> patch set later on this week. That way you can avoid re-spin
> just in case, I have other comments.

Hi Shuah,

Did you have any additional comments for the futex tests?

Thanks,

-- 
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/