Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] parport: return of attach and parport_register_driver

[Sudip Mukherjee]

On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 03:48:57PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 07:00:16PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> >  }
> 
> What really needs to happen is for the parport subsystem to move to the
> driver model, which I don't think ever happened way back during the 2.5
> development cycle.  When that happens, then you will not have code like
> this, and the drivers will work "properly"...
> 
> That's a much larger task, especially trying to do it without breaking
> anything along the way, but it's the "correct" thing to do.

and i guess since parport is orphan so no one is working on that
also, and maybe one more problem you all will be facing is lack
of systems with a parport. I do have systems with parallel port, so
let me try and see if i can do something about it. To start with,
I think I should go back to your LDD3-ch.14 for rest of the day.

regards
sudip

> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/