Re: [PATCH v1 7/7] s390/block/dasd: remove obsolete while -EBUSY loop

[Ming Lei]

On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 2:00 AM, Jarod Wilson <jarod@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 07:32:24PM +0200, Sebastian Ott wrote:
>> On Wed, 8 Apr 2015, Ming Lei wrote:
>> > From: Jarod Wilson <jarod@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> >
>> > With the mutex_trylock bit gone from blkdev_reread_part(), the retry logic
>> > in dasd_scan_partitions() shouldn't be necessary.
>> >
>> > CC: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > CC: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
>> > CC: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> > CC: Alexander Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > CC: Markus Pargmann <mpa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > CC: Stefan Weinhuber <wein@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> > CC: Stefan Haberland <stefan.haberland@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> > CC: Sebastian Ott <sebott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > CC: Fabian Frederick <fabf@xxxxxxxxx>
>> > CC: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > CC: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@xxxxxxxxx>
>> > CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > CC: nbd-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > CC: linux-s390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> > ---
>> >  drivers/s390/block/dasd_genhd.c |   13 +++----------
>> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/drivers/s390/block/dasd_genhd.c b/drivers/s390/block/dasd_genhd.c
>> > index 2af4619..189ea2f 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/s390/block/dasd_genhd.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/s390/block/dasd_genhd.c
>> > @@ -99,9 +99,8 @@ void dasd_gendisk_free(struct dasd_block *block)
>> >  int dasd_scan_partitions(struct dasd_block *block)
>> >  {
>> >     struct block_device *bdev;
>> > -   int retry, rc;
>> > +   int rc;
>> >
>> > -   retry = 5;
>> >     bdev = bdget_disk(block->gdp, 0);
>> >     if (!bdev) {
>> >             DBF_DEV_EVENT(DBF_ERR, block->base, "%s",
>> > @@ -118,14 +117,8 @@ int dasd_scan_partitions(struct dasd_block *block)
>> >     }
>> >
>> >     rc = blkdev_reread_part(bdev);
>> > -   while (rc == -EBUSY && retry > 0) {
>> > -           schedule();
>> > -           rc = blkdev_reread_part(bdev);
>> > -           retry--;
>> > -           DBF_DEV_EVENT(DBF_ERR, block->base,
>> > -                         "scan partitions error, retry %d rc %d",
>> > -                         retry, rc);
>> > -   }
>> > +   DBF_DEV_EVENT(DBF_ERR, block->base,
>> > +                 "scan partitions error, rc %d", rc);
>>
>> Could you please change that to only write the debug message in the error
>> case. Other than that, both dasd patches look good.
>
> D'oh, absolutely. Ming, do you want me to send an updated patch 7 along in
> reply here, or do you want to handle it and/or repost the entire set?

I will handle that, and will add your guys' acked-by and tested-by too,
but need to take a while for looking if there are further comments.

Thanks,
Ming Lei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/