Re: [PATCH] x86, iommu: Fix header comments regarding standard and _FINISH macros

[Borislav Petkov]

On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 10:46:57AM -0500, Aravind Gopalakrishnan wrote:
> The comment line regarding IOMMU_INIT and IOMMU_INIT_FINISH macros
> is incorrect:
> "The standard vs the _FINISH differs in that the _FINISH variant will
>  continue detecting other IOMMUs in the call list..."
> It should be "..the *standard* variant will continue detecting..."
> 
> Fix that.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Aravind Gopalakrishnan <Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/iommu_table.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/iommu_table.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/iommu_table.h
> index f42a047..16845d4 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/iommu_table.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/iommu_table.h
> @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ struct iommu_table_entry {
>   *  d). Similar to the 'init', except that this gets called from pci_iommu_init
>   *      where we do have a memory allocator.
>   *
> - * The standard vs the _FINISH differs in that the _FINISH variant will
> + * The standard vs the _FINISH differs in that the standard variant will
>   * continue detecting other IOMMUs in the call list after the
>   * the detection routine returns a positive number. The _FINISH will
>   * stop the execution chain. Both will still call the 'init' and

Applied, thanks.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/