Re: [PATCH v6 3/4] perf inject: add jitdump mmap injection support

[Adrian Hunter]

On 08/04/15 17:12, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 5:15 AM, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 06/04/15 22:41, Stephane Eranian wrote:
>>>     > +     if (inject.build_ids) {
>>>     > +             /*
>>>     > +              * to make sure the mmap records are ordered correctly
>>>     > +              * and so that the correct especially due to jitted code
>>>     > +              * mmaps. We cannot generate the buildid hit list and
>>>     > +              * inject the jit mmaps at the same time for now.
>>>     > +              */
>>>     > +             inject.tool.ordered_events = true;
>>>     > +             inject.tool.ordering_requires_timestamps = true;
>>>     > +     }
>>>     > +
>>>     > +     if (inject.jit_mode) {
>>>     > +             inject.tool.mmap2          = perf_event__repipe_mmap2;
>>>     > +             inject.tool.mmap           = perf_event__repipe_mmap;
>>>
>>>     As suggested above, why not make your own tool fns e.g.
>>>
>>>                     inject.tool.mmap2          = perf_event__jit_mode_mmap2;
>>>                     inject.tool.mmap           = perf_event__jit_mode_mmap;
>>>
>>>
>>>     > +             inject.tool.ordered_events = true;
>>>     > +             inject.tool.ordering_requires_timestamps = true;
>>>
>>>     You are taking advantage of a bug in perf-inject, that is the
>>>     "finished_round" events are not being processed. Really they should be
>>>     processed and you should inject in time order.
>>>
>>> I am not sure I understand.
>>> Yes, I am trying to have inject reorder the samples instead of perf report.
>>> You are likely to run inject once, and report many times. Also avoids a
>>> warning in report about out-of-order events.
>>
>> Well forgetting about "finished_round", it seems to me you need to intercept
>> all the delivered events (which will be in time order) and inject your own
>> events at the right time.
>>
>> At the moment it seems to me you are injecting all your events in one go
>> when you see the special jitdump mmap. So I would not expect the injected
>> events to be ordered with respect to other events that come later. But
>> maybe I misunderstand that?
>>
> My understanding is that if I set ordered_events  = true, then events
> are not delivered immediately to the callbacks. They are queued and
> sorted and then passed to the callbacks. And yes, there is the finished
> round mechanism of which I don't quite fully understand the logic in this
> case.
> 
>> As I confusingly tried to suggest earlier, one way to see all the
>> delivered events is to hook the ordered_events "deliver" callback. That
>> will mean injecting one mmap event at a time.
>>
>> Here is just an idea.
>>
>> struct perf_inject {
>>         ...
>>         ordered_events__deliver_t deliver;
>> };
>>
>> int cmd_inject(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix __maybe_unused)
>> {
>> ...
>>         inject.deliver = inject.session->ordered_events.deliver;
>>         inject.session->ordered_events.deliver = inject_jit_mmap;
>> ...
>> }
>>
> ok on that.
> 
>> int inject_jit_mmap(struct ordered_events *oe, struct ordered_event *event)
>> {
>>         struct perf_session *session = container_of(oe, struct perf_session, ordered_events);
>>         struct perf_inject *inject = container_of(session->tool, struct perf_inject, tool);
>>
>>         /* Is it time to inject an event */
>>         if (jit_next_timestamp(inject) < event->timestamp) {
>>                 /* Yes, so inject it by delivery */
>>                 perf_session__deliver_synth_event(...);
>>         }
>>         inject->deliver(oe, event);
>> }
>>
> That suggests I have buffered all the MMAPs synthesized from the jitdump and
> I have some sorted queue based on jitdump timestamps.

Yes, but won't the jitdump timestamps already be in order?

>                                                       The test would have to
> be more sophisticated that this. You'd want to insert at the right
> time, i.e., you'd
> have to track the previous and next timestamp in the stream:
> 
> retry:
>     j = jit_next_timestamp(inject->jit);
>    if (prev_event->timestamp <= j && j > next_event->timestamp) {

(prev_event->timestamp <= j) must be always true because otherwise you would
have injected the jit mmap event already.

So perf is about to deliver an event with timestamp 'event->timestamp', so
you just need to deliver all your events that have not already been
delivered but have a timestamp < event->timestamp


>         deliver_synth_event(inject->jit);
>         jit_next(inject->jit);
>         goto retry;
>    }
> 
> All of this is required because the finished round logic is such that perf
> cannot sort all records at once.

It can sort them all at once, but finished_round is an optimization that
starts delivering "early" events before having to sort the "later" events.
The result is still that the delivered events are in sorted order.

>                                  It does sort them by chunks. Thus I need
> to make sure I inject in the right chunk otherwise it won't work. Am I reading
> this right?

If you were to queue the events for sorting, yes. What I suggested was
delivering your events directly at the "right time".

> 
>> You would also need to inject any remaining events right at the end.
>>
>> Note the advantage of "delivering" events is that the same approach works whatever the tool.
>>
>>
> 
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/