Re: [PATCH 1/2] kconfig: Print full defined and depends for multiply-defined symbols
From: Paul Bolle
Date: Sat Apr 11 2015 - 14:57:20 EST
On Sat, 2015-04-11 at 18:36 +0200, Stefan Hengelein wrote:
> If you're reading the dependency list as "what do i have to enable to
> be able to choose a value for FRAME_POINTER" and think, THUMB2_KERNEL
> would be a good choice to leave disabled, you're going to have a bad
> time.
> (The second definition in arm/Kconfig.debug doesn't have a prompt and
> the default has additional conditions)
Please elaborate on "bad time".
> I personally would prefer to
> additionally find the second definition that doesn't a prompt and
> other dependencies instead of adding them to the first entry, but
> that's just my personal preference.
I notice myself getting rather grumpy. (That usually translates to:
"Drop it, and revisit in a few days".) Let me explain.
This is the arm64 entry:
config FRAME_POINTER
bool
default y
This is the hexagon entry
config FRAME_POINTER
def_bool y
This is the m32r entry:
config FRAME_POINTER
bool "Compile the kernel with frame pointers"
help
If you say Y here [...]
And this is the sparc entry:
config FRAME_POINTER
bool
depends on MCOUNT
default y
You'd expect these entries to yield really simple results when doing a
search in menuconfig. But the results show unparseable crap[1]. (And I'm
afraid Gregory's patch would make that even worse. Gregory: please prove
me wrong.)
So to the grumpy me it looks like either:
- menuconfig handles these redefinitions incorrectly in its UI;
- these redefinitions are actually complicated (as in: somehow they
concatenate the dependencies, etc.) and we should probably disallow
them. Because otherwise looking at a Kconfig entry tells you very little
about what is actually going on for the architecture you're interested
in.
What is the grumpy me missing here?
Paul Bolle
[1] The hexagon entry is interesting, probably because it sources
lib/Kconfig.debug _after_ it defined FRAME_POINTER for itself.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/