Re: [PATCH 4/4] UBI: Implement bitrot checking (linux-mtd Digest, Vol 145, Issue 24)

[Boris Brezillon]

On Sun, 12 Apr 2015 23:01:27 +0200
Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx> wrote:


> >>>>>> +static struct device_attribute dev_trigger_bitrot_check =
> >>>>>> +    __ATTR(trigger_bitrot_check, S_IWUSR, NULL, trigger_bitrot_check);
> >>>>>
> >>>>> How about making this attribute a RW one, so that users could check
> >>>>> if there's a bitrot check in progress.
> >>>>
> >>>> As the check will be initiated only by userspace and writing to the trigger
> >>>> while a check is running will return anyway a EBUSY I don't really see
> >>>> a point why userspace would check for it.
> >>>
> >>> Sometime you just want to know whether something is running or not (in
> >>> this case the bitrot check) without risking to trigger a new action...
> >>
> >> Why would they care?
> > 
> > I think is always useful to give some additional information in userspace, from both debugging and diagnostic point of view.
> 
> The question is, why does userspace care?
> Other UBI operations are also not visible...

Yes, but AFAIK other wear-leveling operations are not directly triggered
by user-space.


-- 
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/