linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with the xfs tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi Al,

Today's linux-next merge of the vfs tree got a conflict in
fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c between commit e8e9ad42c1f1 ("xfs: take i_mmap_lock
on extent manipulation operations") from the xfs tree and commit
5dd3dc06371a ("VFS: normal filesystems (and lustre): d_inode()
annotations") from the vfs tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
is required).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

diff --cc fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c
index 015d6a366b16,54b95232d946..000000000000
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c
@@@ -953,13 -975,9 +953,13 @@@ xfs_vn_setattr
  		uint		iolock = XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL;
  
  		xfs_ilock(ip, iolock);
- 		error = xfs_break_layouts(dentry->d_inode, &iolock);
+ 		error = xfs_break_layouts(d_inode(dentry), &iolock);
 -		if (!error)
 +		if (!error) {
 +			xfs_ilock(ip, XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL);
 +			iolock |= XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL;
 +
  			error = xfs_setattr_size(ip, iattr);
 +		}
  		xfs_iunlock(ip, iolock);
  	} else {
  		error = xfs_setattr_nonsize(ip, iattr, 0);

Attachment: pgpgyVcciP5FO.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature