Re: [PATCH v2 05/10] KVM: arm: introduce kvm_arch_setup/clear_debug()

[Christoffer Dall]

On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 04:36:23PM +0200, Christoffer Dall wrote:

[...]

> > +
> > +/**
> > + * kvm_arch_setup_debug - set-up debug related stuff
> 
> nit: I think you want "set up" when it's a verb.
> 
> > + *
> > + * @vcpu:	the vcpu pointer
> > + *
> > + * This is called before each entry in to the hypervisor to setup any
> 
> s/in to/into/
> s/setup/set up/
> 
> > + * debug related registers. Currently this just ensures we will trap
> > + * access to:
> 
> guest accesses to:
> 
> > + *  - Performance monitors (MDCR_EL2_TPM/MDCR_EL2_TPMCR)
> > + *  - Debug ROM Address (MDCR_EL2_TDRA)
> > + *  - Power down debug registers (MDCR_EL2_TDOSA)
> > + *
> > + * Additionally the hypervisor lazily saves/restores the debug
> > + * register state. If it is not currently doing so (arch.debug_flags)
> > + * then we also need to ensure we trap if the guest messes with them
> > + * so we know we need to save them.
> 
> This paragraph is a little hard to make sense of.  If I understand it
> correctly, the point is that when debugging the guest we need to make
> sure guest accesses to the debug registers traps?  If so, I would
> suggest something like:
> 
>   Additionally, KVM only traps guest accesses to the debug registers if
>   the guest is not actively using them (see the KVM_ARM64_DEBUG_DIRTY
>   flag on vcpu->arch.debug_flags).  Since the guest must not interfere
>   with the hardware state when debugging the guest, we must ensure that
>   trapping is enabled whenever we are debugging the guest.
> 

thinking about this, I don't think we're enforcing this yet, but maybe
that will come in the later patches or I misread the original paragraph.

-Christoffer
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/