Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi Russell,

On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 16:08:38 +0100 Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 09:57:48AM -0500, Nathan Lynch wrote:
> > On 03/30/2015 03:08 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Hi Russell,
> > > 
> > > On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 08:15:37 +0100 Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> I'll drop the VDSO stuff from the ARM tree; I can't see a way to keep
> > >> it in my tree and keep my tree buildable without dragging in the tip
> > >> tree.
> > > 
> > > Does it affect your tree on its own?  If not, then it can be fixed when
> > > merged as I have done, or if you look at the tip tree, all you really
> > > need to merge is tip timers/core branch (which I am sure the tip guys
> > > can tell you if it is stable enough) which is about 28 commits ...
> > > 
> > >> The ARM VDSO stuff will just have to wait for 4.2 instead.
> > > 
> > > If that works for you.
> > 
> > FWIW, Stephen's merge fix is correct and I have run my vdso tests
> > without problems on OMAP5 with next-20150330.
> 
> Hopefully, I can pull the tip stuff but if not, I'll try to remember
> to include Stephen's patch with my pull request, but I can't make any
> guarantees - Stephen's email will very quickly get buried in my mailbox,
> and I'll most likely forget about it too... I'm notoriously bad with
> email...

This patch is now needed when the arm tree is merged with Linus' tree
(the tip tree part has been merged).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Attachment: pgpFAdPxS8l9U.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature