RE: [PATCH v3 07/28] IB/Verbs: Reform IB-ulp ipoib

[Hefty, Sean]

> But that moves us in the wrong direction.  If we later support port 2
> without
> port 1 that code will be broken.

I agree that the code will be broken, but supporting that model requires a lot more work in how the ib_cm listens across devices.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/