Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] firmware_loader: introduce new API - request_firmware_direct_full_path()

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 11:56:26AM -0400, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 10:08 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 05:44:55PM +0800, Kweh, Hock Leong wrote:
> >> From: "Kweh, Hock Leong" <hock.leong.kweh@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> Introduce this new API for loading firmware from a specific location
> >> instead of /lib/firmware/ by providing a full path to the firmware
> >> file.
> >
> > Ick, why would we want this?
> >
> 
> Because this mechanism should still work even if /lib is unwriteable
> (e.g it's on squashfs or a read-only NFS root).

Why would a filesystem need to be writable to read a firmware blob from?

> In this regard, UEFI capsules are very much unlike firmware_class
> firmware.  firmware_class firmwise is kind of like device drivers; it
> generally comes from the same vendor as your kernel image and
> /lib/modules, and it can be updated by the same mechanism.  UEFI
> capsules, on the other hand, are one-time things that should be loaded
> at the explicit request of the admin.

Just like BIOS updates, which use the firmware interface.

> There is no reason whatsoever
> that they should exist on persistent storage, and, in fact, there's a
> very good reason that they should not.  On little embedded devices,
> which will apparently be the initial users of this code, keeping the
> capsules around is a waste of valuable space.
> 
> This is why I think that the right approach would be to avoid using
> firmware_class entirely for this.  IMO a simple_char device would be
> the way to go (hint hint...) but other simple approaches are certainly
> possible.

A char device would be present all the time, like a sysfs file to write
the firmware to, so I don't see the difference here.  For a char device,
you would just do the normal open/write/close, just like for the
firmware interface, what is the difference?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/