Re: [PATCH v4 14/27] IB/Verbs: Reform cma_acquire_dev()
From: Hal Rosenstock
Date: Thu Apr 16 2015 - 09:41:39 EST
On 4/16/2015 9:35 AM, Michael Wang wrote:
>
>
> On 04/16/2015 03:19 PM, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> [snip]
>>>
>>> +static inline int cma_validate_port(struct ib_device *device, u8 port,
>>> + union ib_gid *gid, int dev_type)
>>> +{
>>> + u8 found_port;
>>> + int ret = -ENODEV;
>>> +
>>> + if ((dev_type == ARPHRD_INFINIBAND) && !rdma_tech_ib(device, port))
>>> + return ret;
>>> +
>>> + if ((dev_type != ARPHRD_INFINIBAND) && rdma_tech_ib(device, port))
>>> + return ret;
>>> +
>>> + ret = ib_find_cached_gid(device, gid, &found_port, NULL);
>>> +
>>> + if (!ret && (port == found_port))
>>> + return 0;
>>> +
>>> + return ret;
>>
>> Should the case where ret = 0 and port != found_port need to be handled
>> the same as currently ? It looks different to me since in this case the
>> port will be saved into id_priv->id.port_num whereas currently it isn't.
>
> I get your point :-) what about:
>
> ret = ib_find_cached_gid(device, gid, &found_port, NULL);
> if (port != found_port)
> return -ENODEV;
>
> return ret;
Yes, that looks to me to be consistent with the current implementation.
-- Hal
> Regards,
> Michael Wang
>
>>
>> -- Hal
>>
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> static int cma_acquire_dev(struct rdma_id_private *id_priv,
>>> struct rdma_id_private *listen_id_priv)
>>> {
>>> struct rdma_dev_addr *dev_addr = &id_priv->id.route.addr.dev_addr;
>>> struct cma_device *cma_dev;
>>> - union ib_gid gid, iboe_gid;
>>> + union ib_gid gid, iboe_gid, *gidp;
>>> int ret = -ENODEV;
>>> - u8 port, found_port;
>>> - enum rdma_link_layer dev_ll = dev_addr->dev_type == ARPHRD_INFINIBAND ?
>>> - IB_LINK_LAYER_INFINIBAND : IB_LINK_LAYER_ETHERNET;
>>> + u8 port;
>>>
>>> - if (dev_ll != IB_LINK_LAYER_INFINIBAND &&
>>> + if (dev_addr->dev_type != ARPHRD_INFINIBAND &&
>>> id_priv->id.ps == RDMA_PS_IPOIB)
>>> return -EINVAL;
>>>
>>> @@ -391,41 +409,36 @@ static int cma_acquire_dev(struct rdma_id_private *id_priv,
>>>
>>> memcpy(&gid, dev_addr->src_dev_addr +
>>> rdma_addr_gid_offset(dev_addr), sizeof gid);
>>> - if (listen_id_priv &&
>>> - rdma_port_get_link_layer(listen_id_priv->id.device,
>>> - listen_id_priv->id.port_num) == dev_ll) {
>>> +
>>> + if (listen_id_priv) {
>>> cma_dev = listen_id_priv->cma_dev;
>>> port = listen_id_priv->id.port_num;
>>> - if (rdma_node_get_transport(cma_dev->device->node_type) == RDMA_TRANSPORT_IB &&
>>> - rdma_port_get_link_layer(cma_dev->device, port) == IB_LINK_LAYER_ETHERNET)
>>> - ret = ib_find_cached_gid(cma_dev->device, &iboe_gid,
>>> - &found_port, NULL);
>>> - else
>>> - ret = ib_find_cached_gid(cma_dev->device, &gid,
>>> - &found_port, NULL);
>>> + gidp = rdma_tech_iboe(cma_dev->device, port) ?
>>> + &iboe_gid : &gid;
>>>
>>> - if (!ret && (port == found_port)) {
>>> - id_priv->id.port_num = found_port;
>>> + ret = cma_validate_port(cma_dev->device, port, gidp,
>>> + dev_addr->dev_type);
>>> + if (!ret) {
>>> + id_priv->id.port_num = port;
>>> goto out;
>>> }
>>> }
>>> +
>>> list_for_each_entry(cma_dev, &dev_list, list) {
>>> for (port = 1; port <= cma_dev->device->phys_port_cnt; ++port) {
>>> if (listen_id_priv &&
>>> listen_id_priv->cma_dev == cma_dev &&
>>> listen_id_priv->id.port_num == port)
>>> continue;
>>> - if (rdma_port_get_link_layer(cma_dev->device, port) == dev_ll) {
>>> - if (rdma_node_get_transport(cma_dev->device->node_type) == RDMA_TRANSPORT_IB &&
>>> - rdma_port_get_link_layer(cma_dev->device, port) == IB_LINK_LAYER_ETHERNET)
>>> - ret = ib_find_cached_gid(cma_dev->device, &iboe_gid, &found_port, NULL);
>>> - else
>>> - ret = ib_find_cached_gid(cma_dev->device, &gid, &found_port, NULL);
>>> -
>>> - if (!ret && (port == found_port)) {
>>> - id_priv->id.port_num = found_port;
>>> - goto out;
>>> - }
>>> +
>>> + gidp = rdma_tech_iboe(cma_dev->device, port) ?
>>> + &iboe_gid : &gid;
>>> +
>>> + ret = cma_validate_port(cma_dev->device, port, gidp,
>>> + dev_addr->dev_type);
>>> + if (!ret) {
>>> + id_priv->id.port_num = port;
>>> + goto out;
>>> }
>>> }
>>> }
>>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/