Re: [PATCH V4] Fix pointer cast for 32 bits arch
From: Dan Carpenter
Date: Thu Apr 16 2015 - 13:02:23 EST
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 06:14:55PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Peter Senna Tschudin
> <peter.senna@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > --- a/drivers/staging/goldfish/goldfish_audio.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/goldfish/goldfish_audio.c
> > @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ struct goldfish_audio {
> > #define AUDIO_READ(data, addr) (readl(data->reg_base + addr))
> > #define AUDIO_WRITE(data, addr, x) (writel(x, data->reg_base + addr))
> > #define AUDIO_WRITE64(data, addr, addr2, x) \
> > - (gf_write64((u64)(x), data->reg_base + addr, data->reg_base+addr2))
> > + (gf_write_ptr((void *)(x), data->reg_base + addr, data->reg_base+addr2))
>
> This one should not be converted, as all callers pass a dma_addr_t, which may
> be 64-bit on 32-bit systems, i.e. larger than void *.
Ugh... You're right.
I've been avoiding asking this but I can't any longer. What is
gf_write64() actually doing? We are writing dma addresses, user space
pointers and kernel space pointers to this hardware?
This stuff doesn't seem to make any kind of sense and I can easily
imagine a situation where it wrote a 64 bit pointer. Then we partially
write over it with a 32 bit userspace pointer. Then it writes somewhere
totally unintended.
This thing doesn't make any sort of sense to me.
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/