Re: [GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.1-rc1

[Robert Schwebel]

On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 11:22:18PM +0100, One Thousand Gnomes wrote:
> > The reason that 'everyone who works in this area' adopted is not as much
> > that the design is sound (I'm not arguing whether it is or isn't in this
> > case) as it is that none of them could come up with anything better.
>
> Actually most message passing code uses things like JMS and the various
> MQ libraries. Most IoT uses things other than dbus, small deep embedded
> never uses dbus.

For what it's worth: we more and more use dbus for small deep embedded
systems, IoT, loosely coupled industrial control applications etc.

rsc
-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/