Re: [Patch 1/3] firmware: dmi_scan: rename dmi_table to dmi_decode_table

From: Ivan.khoronzhuk
Date: Thu Apr 16 2015 - 16:17:17 EST


Hi Jean,

On 16.04.15 11:35, Jean Delvare wrote:
Hi Matt,

On Wed, 15 Apr 2015 15:35:30 +0100, Matt Fleming wrote:
On Thu, 02 Apr, at 03:57:01PM, Ivan Khoronzhuk wrote:
The "dmi_table" function looks like data instance, but it does DMI
table decode. This patch renames it to "dmi_decode_table" name as
more appropriate. That allows us to use "dmi_table" name for correct
purposes.

Signed-off-by: Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/firmware/dmi_scan.c | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Looks good to me.

Jean, do you want me to pick this patch up or are you going to?
Good question, we need to agree on a strategy.

There are 3 patch sets to consider here.

1* My patch fixing the UUID ordering bug. It must go in first and
immediately, as it fixes a regression and will have to be backported
to stable branches.

||
V


2* 2 older patches from Ivan which are currently in your efi-next tree
if I'm not mistaken. Both were based on an old tree so they do not
apply cleanly on kernel v4.0, I had to fix them up manually. I have

They are in master tree already.

no idea if git would be able to merge them properly, as the fix
above changed the context even more.

Current efi-next already merged, so you should base your patches on
top of last changes.


3* The 3 new patches from Ivan which I am reviewing now, which are not
applied in any public tree AFAIK.

It shouldn't happen,
I've been verifying just now once again.
They are applied on top of linux_next cleanly.
Equal as on efi/next.


I don't really care who picks these patches up and sends them to Linus,
but I think they should all follow the same route so that Linus has as
little merge work to do as possible. So either you pick them all, or I
do. If I do, you'll have to drop the 2 patches you have in efi-next.
Again I'm fine either way, so please let me know what makes your life
easier and let's do that.

Thanks,

Jean,
I'm going to base my series
"firmware: dmi_scan: add SBMIOS entry point and DMI tables"
on top of linux next unless you have already your tree to pick up changes.
Please let me know, if you have one.


--
Regards,
Ivan Khoronzhuk

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/