Re: [PATCHv2 00/10] cleaned up on-demand device creation
From: Minchan Kim
Date: Thu Apr 16 2015 - 19:23:48 EST
Hello,
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 08:55:46PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> Hello,
>
> resending on-demand device creation patch set. sadly, I managed to create a
> mess; so here is my take to clean it up, fold patches and, hopefully, see
> them in 4.1.
Thanks for handling this quickly. I acknowlege dynamic device management part
but I want to review your patchset carefully one more time because you changed
a lot although it's just refactoring. Really sorry for late review. It's totally
my bad. Probably, I will have time to review next week so I feel it's too late
to merge it into 4.1 but I think there is no urgency to merge it.
>
> this mess will not happen again.
>
>
> Andrew picked up some of the commits lined up for 4.1, which required manual
> editing. sorry for that inconvenience.
>
>
> unfortunately, commit c72c6160d967ed26a0b136dbab337f821d233509
> Author: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wed Apr 15 16:15:55 2015 -0700
>
> zram: move compact_store() to sysfs functions area
>
>
> ended up to be different: from a cosmetic change it has transformed into
> a functional change.
>
> I fix it in 0001-zram-enable-compaction-support-in-zram.patch.
>
So Andrew, could you pick 0001 in this merge window? Without it, zram cannot
use compaction feature of zsmalloc so zsmalloc's compaciton feature will be
void.
>
> the rest is functionally identical to what we had in linux-next and mmotm for
> quite some time: in linux-next since Wed Apr 8 09:44:43 2015 +1000
> (commit 273b0791dae2f0b).
>
> it would be nice to see it in 4.1, if possible.
>
> no functional change in zram_drv.c file, compared to zram_drv.c from
> linux-next-20150415 (yes, actually checked). just a couple of additional
> comment tweaks.
>
> like:
>
> -/* allocate and initialize new zram device. the function returns
> - * '>= 0' device_id upon success, and negative value otherwise. */
> +/*
> + * Allocate and initialize new zram device. the function returns
> + * '>= 0' device_id upon success, and negative value otherwise.
> + */
>
> or
>
> /*
> * First, make ->disksize device attr RO, closing
> - * ZRAM_CTL_REMOVE vs disksize_store() race window
> + * zram_remove() vs disksize_store() race window
> */
>
>
> I also picked up the remaining part of Julia Lawall's
> <Julia.Lawall@xxxxxxx> ("zram: fix error return code") commit.
>
> Documentation is identical to linux-next-20150415 version.
>
>
> 8<-------
>
> We currently don't support zram on-demand device creation. The only way
> to have N zram devices is to specify num_devices module parameter (default
> value 1). That means that if, for some reason, at some point, user wants
> to have N + 1 devies he/she must umount all the existing devices, unload
> the module, load the module passing num_devices equals to N + 1. And do
> this again, if needed.
>
> This patchset introduces zram-control sysfs class, which has two sysfs
> attrs:
>
> - zram_add -- add a new zram device
> - zram_remove -- remove a specific (device_id) zram device
>
> Usage example:
> # add a new specific zram device
> cat /sys/class/zram-control/zram_add
> 1
>
> # remove a specific zram device
> echo 4 > /sys/class/zram-control/zram_remove
>
> The patchset also does some cleanups and huge code reorganization.
>
>
> -ss
>
>
> Sergey Senozhatsky (10):
> zram: enable compaction support in zram
> zram: cosmetic ZRAM_ATTR_RO code formatting tweak
> zram: use idr instead of `zram_devices' array
> zram: factor out device reset from reset_store()
> zram: reorganize code layout
> zram: remove max_num_devices limitation
> zram: report every added and removed device
> zram: trivial: correct flag operations comment
> zram: return zram device_id value from zram_add()
> zram: add dynamic device add/remove functionality
>
> Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-zram | 24 +
> Documentation/blockdev/zram.txt | 31 +-
> drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c | 939 +++++++++++++++++------------
> drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.h | 6 -
> 4 files changed, 597 insertions(+), 403 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-zram
>
> --
> 2.4.0.rc1.29.gecc46a1
>
--
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/