Re: [PATCH v4 04/10] mtd: pxa3xx_nand: rework flash detection and timing setup

[Robert Jarzmik]

Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

>> Also, as soon as Robert moves pxa3xx boards fully to DT, we'll loose
>> the pdata timings option above. *sigh*
>> 
> Well, such move would include proper timing DT properties for non-ONFI
> devices.
I will move several boards to DT, including several pxa3x boards, but not _all_
the boards.

For reference, I said in [1] this :
> Actually, this deserves another discussion alltogether. My plan was not to
> convert all pxa board files to dt support, but all internal SoC IPs drivers +
> mach/plat support.
> 
> Or put another way at the end :
>  - there will be at least one pxa25x board which is fully DT converted
>  - there will be at least one pxa27x board which is fully DT converted
>  - there will be at least one pxa3xx board which is fully DT converted
> 
>  - there will be at least one pxa25x board which is not DT converted
>  - there will be at least one pxa27x board which is not DT converted
>  - there will be at least one pxa3xx board which is not DT converted
> 
> I want to keep the support for both legacy platform_data and DT for pxa
> architecture. The idea I had was that only fully DT converted machines will
> benefit from multiplatform support.

And as you said Ezequiel, the problem will arise regardless of being DT or not,
it's a lack of conformance of the zylonite board's nand amongst others.

So the timings will have to survive somewhere, whichever place is seen fit.

Cheers.

-- 
Robert

[1] http://lists.openwall.net/linux-kernel/2015/03/24/101
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/