Re: [PATCH v9 3/4] cgroups: allow a cgroup subsystem to reject a fork

[Tejun Heo]

On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 06:35:41AM +1000, Aleksa Sarai wrote:
> >> Do you also want me to completely drop the COUNT macro? IMO it makes
> >> the CGROUP_<TAG>_COUNT consolidation much nicer.
> >
> > What's wrong with simply having start and end tags?
> 
> Because you'd have to write (CGROUP_TAG_END - CGROUP_TAG_START) every
> time? It's a small addition and it makes referencing the range of a
> tagged section much easier.

Wouldn't loops look more like

	for (subsys = CGROUP_TAG_START; subsys < CGROUP_TAG_END; subsys++)

And even if not, just define a separate macro for the length.  It's
not like we're gonna have a lot of tags.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/