Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] tee: add OP-TEE driver
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Date: Sat Apr 18 2015 - 14:49:13 EST
On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 11:36:53AM +0200, Javier González wrote:
> Hi,
A: No.
Q: Should I include quotations after my reply?
http://daringfireball.net/2007/07/on_top
> We have discussed and implemented an in-kernel interface for the driver.
> However, we need to agree on that interface with the kernel submodules that
> can be interested in using it (e.g., IMA, keyring). We though it was easier
> to have a framework in place before taking this space. This makes sense
> since a TEE driver will be, as for today, mostly used by user space.
> applications.
No, please provide a "real" solution, just providing a framework that no
one uses means that I get to delete it from the kernel tree the next
release, and I doubt you want that :)
Please do all of the work here, as odds are, what you need in the end
will be different from what you have proposed here.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/