Re: [PATCH] iio: common: ssp_sensors: Fix uninitialized warning for timestamp

[Jonathan Cameron]

On 16/04/15 10:30, Karol Wrona wrote:
> calculated_time variable caused warning as uninitialized.  It was not harmful
> because it was evaluated in the path in which was used later but it is to
> satisfy the checkers.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Karol Wrona <k.wrona@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Dumb compiler. It's a false positive and as the function is an inline in the header,
it should be able to tell. 

What compiler is spitting out the warning?

> ---
>  drivers/iio/common/ssp_sensors/ssp_iio.c |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/common/ssp_sensors/ssp_iio.c b/drivers/iio/common/ssp_sensors/ssp_iio.c
> index a3ae165..16180e6 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/common/ssp_sensors/ssp_iio.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/common/ssp_sensors/ssp_iio.c
> @@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ int ssp_common_process_data(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, void *buf,
>  			    unsigned int len, int64_t timestamp)
>  {
>  	__le32 time;
> -	int64_t calculated_time;
> +	int64_t calculated_time = 0;
>  	struct ssp_sensor_data *spd = iio_priv(indio_dev);
>  
>  	if (indio_dev->scan_bytes == 0)
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/