Re: [PATCH 1/3] ASoC: tas571x: Add DT binding document

From: Kevin Cernekee
Date: Mon Apr 20 2015 - 17:16:43 EST


On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 4:16 AM, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 02:42:19PM -0700, Kevin Cernekee wrote:
>
>> +- VDD-supply: regulator phandle for the AVDD/DVDD/HP_VDD supply
>
> This is clearly not correct - if there are three separate physical
> supplies there should be three separate regulators requested. They may
> all resolve to one physical regulator on the board you are working with
> but that might not be true on other boards.

In the "simplified diagram," TI shows a single AVDD/DVDD/HP_VDD supply:

http://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/tas5717.pdf#2

Page 20 also suggests the use of a single 3.3V supply for AVDD/DVDD/HP_VDD.

But this combines a number of separate pins. On 5711 we have
dedicated pins for:

PVDD_A
PVDD_B
PVDD_C
PVDD_D
AVDD
DVDD

On 5717 we have dedicated pins for:

PVDD_AB
PVDD_CD
AVDD
DVDD
HPVDD

I didn't see anything in the datasheet suggesting it is OK to have
different voltages or power states on the various supply pins (other
than the special voltage on PVDD).

I can add as many regulator entries as appropriate. What do you recommend?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/