Re: [patch 10/39] hrtimer: Use cpu_base->active_base for hotpath iterators

[Thomas Gleixner]

On Mon, 20 Apr 2015, Preeti U Murthy wrote:

> On 04/15/2015 02:38 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >>Now that we have the active_bases field in sync we can use it for
> 
> This sentence appears a bit ambiguous. I am guessing you are referring
> to what the first patch in this series did, in which case wouldn't it be
> better if it is stated a bit more elaborately like 'Now that it is
> guaranteed that active_bases field will be in sync with the timerqueue
> on the corresponding clock base' ? It took me a while to figure out what
> the statement was referring to.

Indeed. I'm going to rephrase that.

Thanks,

	tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/