Re: [RESEND PATCH 4.0-rc7 v20 1/6] irqchip: gic: Optimize locking in gic_raise_softirq

[Marc Zyngier]

On 10/04/15 10:51, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> Currently gic_raise_softirq() is locked using upon irq_controller_lock.
> This lock is primarily used to make register read-modify-write sequences
> atomic but gic_raise_softirq() uses it instead to ensure that the
> big.LITTLE migration logic can figure out when it is safe to migrate
> interrupts between physical cores.
> 
> This is sub-optimal in closely related ways:
> 
> 1. No locking at all is required on systems where the b.L switcher is
>    not configured.
> 
> 2. Finer grain locking can be used on systems where the b.L switcher is
>    present.
> 
> This patch resolves both of the above by introducing a separate finer
> grain lock and providing conditionally compiled inlines to lock/unlock
> it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Russell King <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@xxxxxxxxxx>

Looks good to me.

Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx>

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/