Re: [RESEND PATCH 4.0-rc7 v20 2/6] irqchip: gic: Make gic_raise_softirq FIQ-safe

[Marc Zyngier]

On 10/04/15 10:51, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> It is currently possible for FIQ handlers to re-enter gic_raise_softirq()
> and lock up.
> 
>     	gic_raise_softirq()
> 	   lock(x);
> -~-> FIQ
>         handle_fiq()
> 	   gic_raise_softirq()
> 	      lock(x);		<-- Lockup
> 
> arch/arm/ uses IPIs to implement arch_irq_work_raise(), thus this issue
> renders it difficult for FIQ handlers to safely defer work to less
> restrictive calling contexts.
> 
> This patch fixes the problem by converting the cpu_map_migration_lock
> into a rwlock making it safe to re-enter the function.
> 
> Note that having made it safe to re-enter gic_raise_softirq() we no
> longer need to mask interrupts during gic_raise_softirq() because the
> b.L migration is always performed from task context.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Russell King <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@xxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx>

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/