Re: SATA link power management issues

[Tejun Heo]

Hello,

On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 10:29:38PM +0200, Gabriele Mazzotta wrote:
> Doing some quick tests I found that in some cases it takes 5 or 6
> seconds for the first interrupt to arrive, so I'd have to use a quite
> long interval to completely prevent errors.

Hmm...

> I am wondering if it would be better using my original solution
> (i.e. ignore first event), but make it device specific given that it
> might make no sense on other systems and seems to be more reliable than
> the time-based one.

I'm not sure.  What if the extra PHY event isn't that reliable.  It'd
be pretty confusing if it ends up ignoring a legitimate PHY event
after, say, two hours, so one way or the other, we'd need to cap how
long we're gonna be ignoring the event.  Ignore the first PHY event
for 10s after LPM state change?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/