Re: [RESEND PATCH 4.0-rc7 v20 3/6] irqchip: gic: Introduce plumbing for IPI FIQ
From: Daniel Thompson
Date: Tue Apr 21 2015 - 17:03:35 EST
On 21/04/15 14:45, Marc Zyngier wrote:
On 10/04/15 10:51, Daniel Thompson wrote:
Currently it is not possible to exploit FIQ for systems with a GIC, even if
the systems are otherwise capable of it. This patch makes it possible
for IPIs to be delivered using FIQ.
To do so it modifies the register state so that normal interrupts are
placed in group 1 and specific IPIs are placed into group 0. It also
configures the controller to raise group 0 interrupts using the FIQ
signal. It provides a means for architecture code to define which IPIs
shall use FIQ and to acknowledge any IPIs that are raised.
All GIC hardware except GICv1-without-TrustZone support provides a means
to group exceptions into group 0 and group 1 but the hardware
functionality is unavailable to the kernel when a secure monitor is
present because access to the grouping registers are prohibited outside
"secure world". However when grouping is not available (or in the case
of early GICv1 implementations is very hard to configure) the code to
change groups does not deploy and all IPIs will be raised via IRQ.
It has been tested and shown working on two systems capable of
supporting grouping (Freescale i.MX6 and STiH416). It has also been
tested for boot regressions on two systems that do not support grouping
(vexpress-a9 and Qualcomm Snapdragon 600).
Signed-off-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Russell King <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Jon Medhurst <tixy@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm/kernel/traps.c | 5 +-
drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c | 151 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic.h | 8 +++
3 files changed, 153 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/traps.c b/arch/arm/kernel/traps.c
index 788e23fe64d8..b35e220ae1b1 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/traps.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/traps.c
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/sched.h>
#include <linux/irq.h>
+#include <linux/irqchip/arm-gic.h>
#include <linux/atomic.h>
#include <asm/cacheflush.h>
@@ -479,7 +480,9 @@ asmlinkage void __exception_irq_entry handle_fiq_as_nmi(struct pt_regs *regs)
nmi_enter();
- /* nop. FIQ handlers for special arch/arm features can be added here. */
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_GIC
+ gic_handle_fiq_ipi();
+#endif
This hunk is what irritates me. It creates a hard dependency between
core ARM code and the GIC, and I don't really see how this works with
multiplatform, where the interrupt controller is not necessarily a GIC.
In that case, you will die a horrible death.
I was just about to reassure you that there is no bug here... but then I
read the code.
gic_handle_fiq_ipi() was *supposed* to do a check to make it safe to
call when there is no gic meaning multi-platform support could be
achieved by calling into multiple handlers.
It looks like I forgot to write the code that would make this possible.
Maybe I was too disgusted with the approach to implement it correctly.
Looking at this with fresher eyes (I've been having a bit of a break
from FIQ recently) I can see how bad the current approach is.
Why can't we just call handle_arch_irq(), and let the normal handler do
its thing? You can have a "if (in_nmi())" in there, and call your FIQ
function. It would at least save us the above problem.
It should certainly work although it feels odd to reuse the IRQ handler
for FIQ.
All other comments below are fine. I'll fix these.
Daniel.
nmi_exit();
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
index 578ffc5ec087..ffd1c0fe44b2 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/irqchip/chained_irq.h>
#include <linux/irqchip/arm-gic.h>
+#include <linux/ratelimit.h>
#include <asm/cputype.h>
#include <asm/irq.h>
@@ -48,6 +49,10 @@
#include "irq-gic-common.h"
#include "irqchip.h"
+#ifndef SMP_IPI_FIQ_MASK
+#define SMP_IPI_FIQ_MASK 0
+#endif
+
union gic_base {
void __iomem *common_base;
void __percpu * __iomem *percpu_base;
@@ -65,6 +70,7 @@ struct gic_chip_data {
#endif
struct irq_domain *domain;
unsigned int gic_irqs;
+ u32 igroup0_shadow;
#ifdef CONFIG_GIC_NON_BANKED
void __iomem *(*get_base)(union gic_base *);
#endif
@@ -355,6 +361,83 @@ static struct irq_chip gic_chip = {
.irq_set_wake = gic_set_wake,
};
+/*
+ * Shift an interrupt between Group 0 and Group 1.
+ *
+ * In addition to changing the group we also modify the priority to
+ * match what "ARM strongly recommends" for a system where no Group 1
+ * interrupt must ever preempt a Group 0 interrupt.
+ *
+ * If is safe to call this function on systems which do not support
+ * grouping (it will have no effect).
+ */
+static void gic_set_group_irq(struct gic_chip_data *gic, unsigned int hwirq,
+ int group)
+{
+ void __iomem *base = gic_data_dist_base(gic);
+ unsigned int grp_reg = hwirq / 32 * 4;
+ u32 grp_mask = BIT(hwirq % 32);
+ u32 grp_val;
+
+ unsigned int pri_reg = (hwirq / 4) * 4;
+ u32 pri_mask = BIT(7 + ((hwirq % 4) * 8));
+ u32 pri_val;
+
+ /*
+ * Systems which do not support grouping will have not have
+ * the EnableGrp1 bit set.
+ */
+ if (!(GICD_ENABLE_GRP1 & readl_relaxed(base + GIC_DIST_CTRL)))
I took me a moment to parse this. Can we please have the constants on
the right hand side? It is very much a nitpick, but still...
+ return;
+
+ raw_spin_lock(&irq_controller_lock);
+
+ grp_val = readl_relaxed(base + GIC_DIST_IGROUP + grp_reg);
+ pri_val = readl_relaxed(base + GIC_DIST_PRI + pri_reg);
+
+ if (group) {
+ grp_val |= grp_mask;
+ pri_val |= pri_mask;
+ } else {
+ grp_val &= ~grp_mask;
+ pri_val &= ~pri_mask;
+ }
+
+ writel_relaxed(grp_val, base + GIC_DIST_IGROUP + grp_reg);
+ if (grp_reg == 0)
+ gic->igroup0_shadow = grp_val;
+
+ writel_relaxed(pri_val, base + GIC_DIST_PRI + pri_reg);
+
+ raw_spin_unlock(&irq_controller_lock);
+}
+
+
+/*
+ * Fully acknowledge (both ack and eoi) any outstanding FIQ-based IPI,
+ * otherwise do nothing.
+ */
+void gic_handle_fiq_ipi(void)
+{
+ struct gic_chip_data *gic = &gic_data[0];
+ void __iomem *cpu_base = gic_data_cpu_base(gic);
+ unsigned long irqstat, irqnr;
+
+ if (WARN_ON(!in_nmi()))
+ return;
+
+ while ((1u << readl_relaxed(cpu_base + GIC_CPU_HIGHPRI)) &
+ SMP_IPI_FIQ_MASK) {
+ irqstat = readl_relaxed(cpu_base + GIC_CPU_INTACK);
+ writel_relaxed(irqstat, cpu_base + GIC_CPU_EOI);
+
+ irqnr = irqstat & GICC_IAR_INT_ID_MASK;
+ WARN_RATELIMIT(irqnr > 16,
+ "Unexpected irqnr %lu (bad prioritization?)\n",
+ irqnr);
+ }
+}
+
void __init gic_cascade_irq(unsigned int gic_nr, unsigned int irq)
{
if (gic_nr >= MAX_GIC_NR)
@@ -386,15 +469,24 @@ static u8 gic_get_cpumask(struct gic_chip_data *gic)
static void gic_cpu_if_up(void)
{
void __iomem *cpu_base = gic_data_cpu_base(&gic_data[0]);
- u32 bypass = 0;
+ void __iomem *dist_base = gic_data_dist_base(&gic_data[0]);
+ u32 ctrl = 0;
/*
- * Preserve bypass disable bits to be written back later
- */
- bypass = readl(cpu_base + GIC_CPU_CTRL);
- bypass &= GICC_DIS_BYPASS_MASK;
+ * Preserve bypass disable bits to be written back later
+ */
+ ctrl = readl(cpu_base + GIC_CPU_CTRL);
+ ctrl &= GICC_DIS_BYPASS_MASK;
- writel_relaxed(bypass | GICC_ENABLE, cpu_base + GIC_CPU_CTRL);
+ /*
+ * If EnableGrp1 is set in the distributor then enable group 1
+ * support for this CPU (and route group 0 interrupts to FIQ).
+ */
+ if (GICD_ENABLE_GRP1 & readl_relaxed(dist_base + GIC_DIST_CTRL))
+ ctrl |= GICC_COMMON_BPR | GICC_FIQ_EN | GICC_ACK_CTL |
+ GICC_ENABLE_GRP1;
+
+ writel_relaxed(ctrl | GICC_ENABLE, cpu_base + GIC_CPU_CTRL);
}
@@ -418,7 +510,23 @@ static void __init gic_dist_init(struct gic_chip_data *gic)
gic_dist_config(base, gic_irqs, NULL);
- writel_relaxed(GICD_ENABLE, base + GIC_DIST_CTRL);
+ /*
+ * Set EnableGrp1/EnableGrp0 (bit 1 and 0) or EnableGrp (bit 0 only,
+ * bit 1 ignored) depending on current mode.
+ */
+ writel_relaxed(GICD_ENABLE_GRP1 | GICD_ENABLE, base + GIC_DIST_CTRL);
+
+ /*
+ * Set all global interrupts to be group 1 if (and only if) it
+ * is possible to enable group 1 interrupts. This register is RAZ/WI
+ * if not accessible or not implemented, however some GICv1 devices
+ * do not implement the EnableGrp1 bit making it unsafe to set
+ * this register unconditionally.
+ */
+ if (GICD_ENABLE_GRP1 & readl_relaxed(base + GIC_DIST_CTRL))
+ for (i = 32; i < gic_irqs; i += 32)
+ writel_relaxed(0xffffffff,
+ base + GIC_DIST_IGROUP + i * 4 / 32);
}
static void gic_cpu_init(struct gic_chip_data *gic)
@@ -427,6 +535,7 @@ static void gic_cpu_init(struct gic_chip_data *gic)
void __iomem *base = gic_data_cpu_base(gic);
unsigned int cpu_mask, cpu = smp_processor_id();
int i;
+ unsigned long secure_irqs, secure_irq;
I'd rather see u32 being used for secure_irqs. Remember that this used
on arm64 as well.
/*
* Get what the GIC says our CPU mask is.
@@ -445,6 +554,20 @@ static void gic_cpu_init(struct gic_chip_data *gic)
gic_cpu_config(dist_base, NULL);
+ /*
+ * If the distributor is configured to support interrupt grouping
+ * then set any PPI and SGI interrupts not set in SMP_IPI_FIQ_MASK
+ * to be group1 and ensure any remaining group 0 interrupts have
+ * the right priority.
+ */
+ if (GICD_ENABLE_GRP1 & readl_relaxed(dist_base + GIC_DIST_CTRL)) {
+ secure_irqs = SMP_IPI_FIQ_MASK;
+ writel_relaxed(~secure_irqs, dist_base + GIC_DIST_IGROUP + 0);
+ gic->igroup0_shadow = ~secure_irqs;
+ for_each_set_bit(secure_irq, &secure_irqs, 16)
+ gic_set_group_irq(gic, secure_irq, 0);
+ }
+
writel_relaxed(GICC_INT_PRI_THRESHOLD, base + GIC_CPU_PRIMASK);
gic_cpu_if_up();
}
@@ -534,7 +657,8 @@ static void gic_dist_restore(unsigned int gic_nr)
writel_relaxed(gic_data[gic_nr].saved_spi_enable[i],
dist_base + GIC_DIST_ENABLE_SET + i * 4);
- writel_relaxed(GICD_ENABLE, dist_base + GIC_DIST_CTRL);
+ writel_relaxed(GICD_ENABLE_GRP1 | GICD_ENABLE,
+ dist_base + GIC_DIST_CTRL);
}
static void gic_cpu_save(unsigned int gic_nr)
@@ -662,6 +786,7 @@ static void gic_raise_softirq(const struct cpumask *mask, unsigned int irq)
{
int cpu;
unsigned long map = 0;
+ unsigned long softint;
u32, please.
gic_migration_lock();
@@ -675,8 +800,14 @@ static void gic_raise_softirq(const struct cpumask *mask, unsigned int irq)
*/
dmb(ishst);
- /* this always happens on GIC0 */
- writel_relaxed(map << 16 | irq, gic_data_dist_base(&gic_data[0]) + GIC_DIST_SOFTINT);
+ /* We avoid a readl here by using the shadow copy of IGROUP[0] */
+ softint = map << 16 | irq;
+ if (gic_data[0].igroup0_shadow & BIT(irq))
+ softint |= 0x8000;
+
+ /* This always happens on GIC0 */
+ writel_relaxed(softint,
+ gic_data_dist_base(&gic_data[0]) + GIC_DIST_SOFTINT);
gic_migration_unlock();
}
diff --git a/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic.h b/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic.h
index 71d706d5f169..7690f70049a3 100644
--- a/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic.h
+++ b/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic.h
@@ -22,6 +22,10 @@
#define GIC_CPU_IDENT 0xfc
#define GICC_ENABLE 0x1
+#define GICC_ENABLE_GRP1 0x2
+#define GICC_ACK_CTL 0x4
+#define GICC_FIQ_EN 0x8
+#define GICC_COMMON_BPR 0x10
#define GICC_INT_PRI_THRESHOLD 0xf0
#define GICC_IAR_INT_ID_MASK 0x3ff
#define GICC_INT_SPURIOUS 1023
@@ -44,6 +48,7 @@
#define GIC_DIST_SGI_PENDING_SET 0xf20
#define GICD_ENABLE 0x1
+#define GICD_ENABLE_GRP1 0x2
#define GICD_DISABLE 0x0
#define GICD_INT_ACTLOW_LVLTRIG 0x0
#define GICD_INT_EN_CLR_X32 0xffffffff
@@ -121,5 +126,8 @@ static inline void __init register_routable_domain_ops
{
gic_routable_irq_domain_ops = ops;
}
+
+void gic_handle_fiq_ipi(void);
+
#endif /* __ASSEMBLY */
#endif
--
2.1.0
Thanks,
M.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/