Re: [RFC 0/6] perf tools: Report event parsing errors
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Date: Wed Apr 22 2015 - 10:38:01 EST
Em Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 04:08:50PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 05:38:52PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 10:15:39PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > > On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 05:09:36PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > > Which is nice, wouldn't it be good to have it for the that as well, i.e.
> > > > for your example "ev=" would be a valid, and shorter form of "even=" or
> > > > "event=".
> > > hum, not sure I follow.. could you please explain in more details?
> > This would be considered valid:
> > $ ./perf record -e 'cpu/even=0x1/' ls
> > event syntax error: 'cpu/even=0x1/'
> > \___ unknown term
> > valid terms: "event", "raw".
> > "even=" would be recognized as a shorter form of "event=", "evint="
> > would be invalid :-)
> hum I see.. seem to be touching the bison/flex core part, might not
> be that easy I'll think about it.. ;-)
This is just a "nice to have" feature, that would make it consistent
accross the tools, i.e. it works for long option processing, it would
work for event parsing, etc, but I guess you can leave it for when there
is a blizzard and you get stuck at home or something like that ;-)
- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/