Re: [GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.1-rc1

[Stephen Smalley]

On 04/23/2015 01:16 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> The binder developers at Samsung have stated that the implementation we
> have here works for their model as well, so I guess that is some kind of
> verification it's not entirely tied to D-Bus.  They have plans on
> dropping the existing binder kernel code and using the kdbus code
> instead when it is merged.

Where do things stand wrt LSM hooks for kdbus?  I don't see any security
hook calls in the kdbus tree except for the purpose of metadata
collection of process security labels.  But nothing for enforcing MAC
over kdbus IPC.  binder has a set of security hooks for that purpose, so
it would be a regression wrt MAC enforcement to switch from binder to
kdbus without equivalent checking there.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/