Re: [GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.1-rc1

[Karol Lewandowski]

On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 09:30:13PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 01:42:25PM -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> > On 04/23/2015 01:16 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > The binder developers at Samsung have stated that the implementation we
> > > have here works for their model as well, so I guess that is some kind of
> > > verification it's not entirely tied to D-Bus.  They have plans on
> > > dropping the existing binder kernel code and using the kdbus code
> > > instead when it is merged.
> > 
> > Where do things stand wrt LSM hooks for kdbus?  I don't see any security
> > hook calls in the kdbus tree except for the purpose of metadata
> > collection of process security labels.  But nothing for enforcing MAC
> > over kdbus IPC.  binder has a set of security hooks for that purpose, so
> > it would be a regression wrt MAC enforcement to switch from binder to
> > kdbus without equivalent checking there.
> 
> There was a set of LSM hooks proposed for kdbus posted by Karol
> Lewandowsk last October, and it also included SELinux and Smack patches.
> They were going to be refreshed based on the latest code changes, but I
> haven't seen them posted, or I can't seem to find them in my limited
> email archive.

We have been waiting for right moment with these. :-)

> Karol, what's the status of them?

I have handed patchset over to Paul Osmialowski who started rework it for v4
relatively recently.  I think it shouldn't be that hard to post updated version...

Paul?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/