Re: [PATCH] enforce function inlining for hot functions

[Andrew Morton]

On Thu, 23 Apr 2015 23:40:01 +0200 Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> GCC inlining heuristics are sometimes quizzical. Especially with inline
> assembler constructs GCC seems to have issues. A allyesconfig show a rather
> long list of functions where GCC inlining decisions are questionable (not
> inlined).

I can't reproduce this with either gcc-4.8.2 or gcc-4.4.4.  The patch
makes zero difference to `size vmlinux' and a bit of poking around with
nm doesn't show any out-of-lined versions of the functions you
identify.

So.  More details, please.  How to demonstrate this, gcc versions, etc.

> Furthermore, because the functions are declared with static
> linkage each function is copied n times - and n can be rather high:
> 
>               atomic_inc: 544 duplicates
>          rcu_read_unlock: 453 duplicates
>            rcu_read_lock: 383 duplicates
>              get_dma_ops: 271 duplicates
>   arch_local_irq_restore: 258 duplicates
>               atomic_dec: 215 duplicates
>                  kzalloc: 185 duplicates
>            cpumask_check: 157 duplicates
>         test_and_set_bit: 156 duplicates
>             cpumask_next: 146 duplicates
>                 list_del: 131 duplicates
>                 kref_get: 126 duplicates

That's pretty pathetic.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/