Re: [PATCH 00/21] ARCNET: Defibrillation

[David Miller]

From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 23:14:41 +0200

> On 04/24/2015 08:47 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
>> On Fri, 2015-04-24 at 19:20 +0200, Michael Grzeschik wrote:
>>> Hi!
>> 
>> Hello.
>> 
>>> This patch series tries to reanimate the ARCNET hardware layer to be
>>> somehow readable and maintainable again. It includes a lot of cleanup
>>> patches. It also adds some fixes which leads the layer to become usable
>>> again. And as a special treatment it adds more features like correct
>>> loading and unloading of the com20020 card.
>> 
>> Wow.  Good for you, but why?  Does anyone still use these?
> 
> Yes, there are parts of the industry where "old" machines are
> retrofitted with new hardware...and a lot of these machines still talk
> ARCNET :)

But the real issue is, this layer is development wise in the same
category as the IDE layer.

Any non-trivial change is nothing but pure risk, especially given the
low level of test coverage the code gets.

So I really only want to see the most critical obvious bug fixes
submitted for this layer and drivers.

And no I will not accept an argument stating that you have to
restructure and clean this code up in order to fix the bugs.  That's
bogus.

I'm rejecting this patch series, sorry.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/