Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: sunxi: spi: use proper errno when message is too long.
From: Maxime Ripard
Date: Sun Apr 26 2015 - 04:45:11 EST
On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 09:21:07PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek <hramrach@xxxxxxxxx>
No commit log?
> ---
> drivers/spi/spi-sun4i.c | 2 +-
> drivers/spi/spi-sun6i.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-sun4i.c b/drivers/spi/spi-sun4i.c
> index fbb0a4d..8238b4e 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-sun4i.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-sun4i.c
> @@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ static int sun4i_spi_transfer_one(struct spi_master *master,
>
> /* We don't support transfer larger than the FIFO */
> if (tfr->len > SUN4I_FIFO_DEPTH)
> - return -EINVAL;
> + return -EMSGSIZE;
Is it still a thing? The patch to remove such limit hasn't been merged
yet?
> reinit_completion(&sspi->done);
> sspi->tx_buf = tfr->tx_buf;
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-sun6i.c b/drivers/spi/spi-sun6i.c
> index ac48f59..0f5dd91 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-sun6i.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-sun6i.c
> @@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ static int sun6i_spi_transfer_one(struct spi_master *master,
>
> /* We don't support transfer larger than the FIFO */
> if (tfr->len > SUN6I_FIFO_DEPTH)
> - return -EINVAL;
> + return -EMSGSIZE;
Eventually, we should move to using DMA for these messages longer than
the FIFO.
I should post these patches.
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature