[PATCH 3.19 10/27] tcp: fix FRTO undo on cumulative ACK of SACKed range

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

3.19-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@xxxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit 666b805150efd62f05810ff0db08f44a2370c937 ]

On processing cumulative ACKs, the FRTO code was not checking the
SACKed bit, meaning that there could be a spurious FRTO undo on a
cumulative ACK of a previously SACKed skb.

The FRTO code should only consider a cumulative ACK to indicate that
an original/unretransmitted skb is newly ACKed if the skb was not yet
SACKed.

The effect of the spurious FRTO undo would typically be to make the
connection think that all previously-sent packets were in flight when
they really weren't, leading to a stall and an RTO.

Signed-off-by: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@xxxxxxxxxx>
Fixes: e33099f96d99c ("tcp: implement RFC5682 F-RTO")
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c |    7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
@@ -3104,10 +3104,11 @@ static int tcp_clean_rtx_queue(struct so
 			if (!first_ackt.v64)
 				first_ackt = last_ackt;
 
-			if (!(sacked & TCPCB_SACKED_ACKED))
+			if (!(sacked & TCPCB_SACKED_ACKED)) {
 				reord = min(pkts_acked, reord);
-			if (!after(scb->end_seq, tp->high_seq))
-				flag |= FLAG_ORIG_SACK_ACKED;
+				if (!after(scb->end_seq, tp->high_seq))
+					flag |= FLAG_ORIG_SACK_ACKED;
+			}
 		}
 
 		if (sacked & TCPCB_SACKED_ACKED)


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/