Re: [PATCH 3/3 V8] workqueue: Allow modifying low level unbound workqueue cpumask

From: Tejun Heo
Date: Mon Apr 27 2015 - 23:49:32 EST


Hello,

On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 10:24:31AM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> >> Wouldn't this make a lot more sense above when copying @attrs into
> >> @new_attrs? The comment there even says "make a copy of @attrs and
> >> sanitize it". Copy to @new_attrs, mask with wq_unbound_cpumask and
> >> fall back to wq_unbound_cpumask if empty.
>
> We need to save the user original configured attrs.
> When any time wq_unbound_cpumask is changed, we should use
> the user original configured attrs (cpumask) to re-calculate
> the pwqs and avoid losing any information.

Sure, we can do that for new_attrs and then mask tmp_attrs further w/
wq_unbound_cpumask, no?

Thanks.

--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/