Re: [PATCH v6 10/15] serial: stm32-usart: Add STM32 USART Driver
From: Maxime Coquelin
Date: Tue Apr 28 2015 - 08:13:31 EST
Hi Vladimir,
Thanks for the review, and sorry for the late reply.
2015-04-09 15:04 GMT+02:00 Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> Hi Maxime,
>
> On 07.04.2015 19:30, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
>> This drivers adds support to the STM32 USART controller, which is a
>> standard serial driver.
>>
>> Tested-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Reviewed-by: Peter Hurley <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/tty/serial/Kconfig | 17 +
>> drivers/tty/serial/Makefile | 1 +
>> drivers/tty/serial/stm32-usart.c | 735 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> include/uapi/linux/serial_core.h | 3 +
>> 4 files changed, 756 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 drivers/tty/serial/stm32-usart.c
>
> [snip]
>
>> +static void stm32_console_write(struct console *co, const char *s, unsigned cnt)
>> +{
>> + struct uart_port *port = &stm32_ports[co->index].port;
>> + unsigned long flags;
>> + u32 old_cr1, new_cr1;
>> + int locked = 1;
>> +
>> + if (oops_in_progress) {
>> + locked = spin_trylock_irqsave(&port->lock, flags);
>> + } else {
>> + locked = 1; ID
>
> locked = 1 is done from the declaration.
Right, I will fix this in next version
>
> Also do you want to add "if (port->sysrq) locked = 0;" check?
Yes, that makes sense. It will be also in v7.
>
>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&port->lock, flags);
>> + }
>> +
>
> [snip]
>
> Everything else is fine from point of view.
>
> Reviewed-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@xxxxxxxxxx>
Regards,
Maxime
>
> --
> With best wishes,
> Vladimir
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/