Re: [PATCH V3 2/2] pinctrl: Add Pistachio SoC pin control driver

[Andrew Bresticker]

On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Ezequiel Garcia
<ezequiel.garcia@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Andrew,
>
> On 04/07/2015 04:44 PM, Andrew Bresticker wrote:
> [..]
>> +static int pistachio_pinmux_enable(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
>> +                                unsigned func, unsigned group)
>> +{
>> +     struct pistachio_pinctrl *pctl = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev);
>> +     const struct pistachio_pin_group *pg = &pctl->groups[group];
>> +     const struct pistachio_function *pf = &pctl->functions[func];
>> +     struct pinctrl_gpio_range *range;
>> +     unsigned int i;
>> +     u32 val;
>> +
>> +     if (pg->mux_reg > 0) {
>> +             for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(pg->mux_option); i++) {
>> +                     if (pg->mux_option[i] == func)
>> +                             break;
>> +             }
>> +             if (i == ARRAY_SIZE(pg->mux_option)) {
>> +                     dev_err(pctl->dev, "Cannot mux pin %u to function %u\n",
>> +                             group, func);
>> +                     return -EINVAL;
>> +             }
>> +
>> +             val = pctl_readl(pctl, pg->mux_reg);
>> +             val &= ~(pg->mux_mask << pg->mux_shift);
>> +             val |= i << pg->mux_shift;
>> +             pctl_writel(pctl, val, pg->mux_reg);
>> +
>> +             if (pf->scenarios) {
>> +                     for (i = 0; i < pf->nscenarios; i++) {
>> +                             if (pf->scenarios[i] == group)
>> +                                     break;
>> +                     }
>> +                     if (WARN_ON(i == pf->nscenarios))
>> +                             return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +                     val = pctl_readl(pctl, pf->scenario_reg);
>> +                     val &= ~(pf->scenario_mask << pf->scenario_shift);
>> +                     val |= i << pf->scenario_shift;
>> +                     pctl_writel(pctl, val, pf->scenario_reg);
>> +             }
>> +     }
>> +
>> +     range = pinctrl_find_gpio_range_from_pin(pctl->pctldev, group);
>> +     if (range)
>> +             gpio_disable(gc_to_bank(range->gc), group - range->pin_base);
>> +
>
> If you plan to submit a v4, how about using "pg->pins" here instead of "group"?
>
> Using "group" relies on having the same numberspace for the group and the pin,
> and it'll break when introducing the RPU pinctrl.

Sure, will do.

-Andrew
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/