Re: [PATCH V7 4/9] mfd: Add binding document for NVIDIA Tegra XUSB

From: Andrew Bresticker
Date: Wed Apr 29 2015 - 13:02:46 EST


Lee,

On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 2:25 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Apr 2015, Andrew Bresticker wrote:
>
>> Add a binding document for the XUSB host complex on NVIDIA Tegra124
>> and later SoCs. The XUSB host complex includes a mailbox for
>> communication with the XUSB micro-controller and an xHCI host-controller.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@xxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Kumar Gala <galak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> New for v7.
>> ---
>> .../bindings/mfd/nvidia,tegra124-xusb.txt | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/nvidia,tegra124-xusb.txt
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/nvidia,tegra124-xusb.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/nvidia,tegra124-xusb.txt
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..6a46680
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/nvidia,tegra124-xusb.txt
>> @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
>> +NVIDIA Tegra XUSB host copmlex
>> +==============================
>> +
>> +The XUSB host complex on Tegra124 and later SoCs contains an xHCI host
>> +controller and a mailbox for communication with the XUSB micro-controller.
>> +
>> +Required properties:
>> +--------------------
>> + - compatible: For Tegra124, must contain "nvidia,tegra124-xusb".
>> + Otherwise, must contain '"nvidia,<chip>-xusb", "nvidia,tegra124-xusb"'
>> + where <chip> is tegra132.
>
> Okay. Why?

Why what? This is the convention used for Tegra bindings and is also
documented in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.txt.
See nvidia,tegra114-spi.txt and nvidia,tegra20-i2c.txt for other
examples of this.

>> + - reg: Must contain register base and length for each register set listed
>> + in reg-names.
>
> You've mentioned 2 of the cells, what about the remaining 2?

The example given was for Tegra124, where there are two address cells
and two size cells.

>> + - reg-names: Must include the following entries:
>> + - xhci
>> + - fpci
>> + - ipfs
>> + - interrupts: Must contain an interrupt for each entry in interrupt-names.
>> + - interrupt-names: Must include the following entries:
>> + - host
>> + - smi
>> + - pme
>> +
>> +Example:
>> +--------
>> + usb@0,70090000 {
>> + compatible = "nvidia,tegra124-xusb";
>> + reg = <0x0 0x70090000 0x0 0x8000>,
>> + <0x0 0x70098000 0x0 0x1000>,
>> + <0x0 0x70099000 0x0 0x1000>;
>> + reg-names = "xhci", "fpci", "ipfs";
>> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 39 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>> + <GIC_SPI 40 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HGIH>,
>> + <GIC_SPI 43 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>> + interrupt-names = "host", "smi", "pme";
>
> Are these resources used by both children?

Only the FPCI register set is shared.

> If not, place them into the children and ioremap() them from the
> associated child drivers.

Ok.

-Andrew
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/