Re: [GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.1-rc1

[John Stoffel]

>>>>> "Steven" == Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

Steven> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:26:59PM -0400, John Stoffel wrote:
>> 
>> If your customers wnat this feature, you're more than welcome to fork
>> the kernel and support it yourself.  Oh wait... Redhat does that
>> already.  So what's the problem?   Just put it into RHEL (which I use
>> I admit, along with Debian/Mint) and be done with it.

Steven> Red Hat tries very hard to push things upstream. It's policy
Steven> is to not keep things for themselves, but always work with the
Steven> community. That way, everyone benefits. Ideally, we should
Steven> come up with a solution that works for all.

Yeah, I agree they have been good.  I'm just reacting to the off the
cuff comment of "my customers need it" which isn't a justification for
this feature, esp when it hasn't been shown to be needed in the
kernel.  

We went through alot of this with tux the in-kernel httpd server, and
pushing other stuff out to user-space over the years.  Why this needs
to come in isn't clear.  Or why not just a small part needing to come
in with the rest in userspace.   

John
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/