Re: [PATCH v9 2/3] watchdog: add watchdog_cpumask sysctl to assist nohz

[Andrew Morton]

On Fri, 17 Apr 2015 14:37:17 -0400 Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Change the default behavior of watchdog so it only runs on the
> housekeeping cores when nohz_full is enabled at build and boot time.
> Allow modifying the set of cores the watchdog is currently running
> on with a new kernel.watchdog_cpumask sysctl.
> 
> If we allowed the watchdog to run on nohz_full cores, the timer
> interrupts and scheduler work would prevent the desired tickless
> operation on those cores.  But if we disable the watchdog globally,
> then the housekeeping cores can't benefit from the watchdog
> functionality.  So we allow disabling it only on some cores.
> See Documentation/lockup-watchdogs.txt for more information.
> 
> ...
>  
> +watchdog_cpumask:
> +
> +This value can be used to control on which cpus the watchdog may run.
> +The default cpumask is all possible cores, but if NO_HZ_FULL is
> +enabled in the kernel config, and cores are specified with the
> +nohz_full= boot argument, those cores are excluded by default.
> +Offline cores can be included in this mask, and if the core is later
> +brought online, the watchdog will be started based on the mask value.
> +
> +Typically this value would only be touched in the nohz_full case
> +to re-enable cores that by default were not running the watchdog,
> +if a kernel lockup was suspected on those cores.

Now the reader is wondering "how the heck do I specify a cpumask".  Is
it hex encoded?  decimal?  binary string?  Which bit corresponds to
which CPU?

A little example would help things along.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/