Re: [PATCH RFC] x86: enforce inlining for atomics

[Henrique de Moraes Holschuh]

On Wed, 22 Apr 2015, Hagen Paul Pfeifer wrote:
> On 22 April 2015 at 11:28, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > So I think the original patch makes sense (and I already applied it),
> > we want known-simple and performance critical methods (such as atomic
> > ops) always inlined.
> 
> Right. As I wrote I will post a follow up patch for the remaining
> cases where inline is a must. To guarantee that performance critical
> functions are always inlined - no matter what configuration is used.

It would be nice to see those patches in -stable eventually, please...

-- 
  "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
  them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
  where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
  Henrique Holschuh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/