Re: [PATCH 3/3] tracing/mm: Don't trace mm_page_pcpu_drain on offline cpus

[Preeti Murthy]

On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 10:49 PM, Shreyas B Prabhu
<shreyas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> On Wednesday 29 April 2015 10:38 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>>> I am not sure if its worth the effort now. It doesn't look like any
>>> other trace point apart from the above use case will benefit from it.
>>> Only smbus_write and smbus_reply seem to come close. But even they need
>>> separate TP_fast_assign.
>>
>> It shouldn't be a problem to implement. But I'm currently cleaning up
>> those files, and any changes will cause nasty conflicts.
>>
>> Lets do this. Push the current changes as is, and when I get around to
>> adding a DEFINE_EVENT_PRINT_CONDITION(), we can modify that code to use
>> it.
>>
> Okay, sure.

Looks good then.

Reviewed-by: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Thanks,
> Shreyas
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/