Re: xfs: does mkfs.xfs require fancy switches to get decent performance? (was Tux3 Report: How fast can we fsync?)

[Mike Galbraith]

On Wed, 2015-04-29 at 14:12 -0700, Daniel Phillips wrote:

> Btrfs appears to optimize tiny files by storing them in its big btree,
> the equivalent of our itree, and Tux3 doesn't do that yet, so we are a
> bit hobbled for a make load.

That's not a build load, it's a git load.  btrfs beat all others at the
various git/quilt things I tried (since that's what I do lots of in real
life), but tux3 looked quite good too.

As Dave noted though, an orchard produces oodles of apples over its
lifetime, these shiny new apples may lose luster over time ;-)

	-Mike

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/