Re: Module stacking next steps

From: James Morris
Date: Thu Apr 30 2015 - 07:20:37 EST


On Wed, 29 Apr 2015, John Johansen wrote:

> On 04/29/2015 06:55 PM, James Morris wrote:
> > On Tue, 21 Apr 2015, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> James, do you want to take the module stacking changes in through
> >> the security tree? Are there remaining objections or concerns? What
> >> procedure would you like to follow?
> >
> > What's the overall consensus on this -- do people generally see it as
> > useful and necessary, and is it ready to go in?
> >
> > Any objections or concerns?
> >
> No objections, and I know there are several people interested in seeing
> this land.
>
> I am happy with the code, and my only concerns lie with things that this
> explicitly doesn't support yet (ie. larger lsm stacking, secids, ...)

Ok, Casey, please send an updated final version for everyone to check.


--
James Morris
<jmorris@xxxxxxxxx>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/