Re: [PATCH] firmware: dmi_scan: Only honor end-of-table for 64-bit tables
From: Jean Delvare
Date: Thu Apr 30 2015 - 09:46:30 EST
Hi Ard,
Le Thursday 30 April 2015 Ã 12:37 +0200, Ard Biesheuvel a Ãcrit :
> On 28 April 2015 at 20:41, Jean Delvare <jdelvare@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > From: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@xxxxxxx>
> > Subject: firmware: dmi_scan: Only honor end-of-table for 64-bit tables
> >
> > A 32-bit entry point to a DMI table says how many structures the table
> > contains. The SMBIOS specification explicitly says that end-of-table
> > markers should be ignored if they are not actually at the end of the
> > DMI table. So only honor the end-of-table marker for tables accessed
> > through 64-bit entry points, as they do not specify a structure count.
> >
> > Fixes: fc43026278 ("dmi: add support for SMBIOS 3.0 64-bit entry point")
> > Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@xxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/firmware/dmi_scan.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > --- linux-4.1-rc1.orig/drivers/firmware/dmi_scan.c 2015-04-28 16:39:00.845282262 +0200
> > +++ linux-4.1-rc1/drivers/firmware/dmi_scan.c 2015-04-28 16:47:35.092644748 +0200
> > @@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ static void dmi_table(u8 *buf,
> > /*
> > * 7.45 End-of-Table (Type 127) [SMBIOS reference spec v3.0.0]
>
> I wrote this comment under the assumption that type #127 was new in
> v3, but apparently it is not.
> Since you are changing the test below into something non-trivial,
> could we perhaps update the comment to explain better what goes on
> here?
Good idea, thanks for suggesting. Version 2 of the patch is coming.
> > */
> > - if (dm->type == DMI_ENTRY_END_OF_TABLE)
> > + if (!dmi_num && dm->type == DMI_ENTRY_END_OF_TABLE)
> > break;
> >
> > data += 2;
> >
--
Jean Delvare
SUSE L3 Support
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/