Re: [PATCH 0/3] Introduce SET_NOIRQ_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS and use it

[Pavel Machek]

On Mon 2015-04-27 21:24:29, grygorii.strashko@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> While working on suspend-to-disk functionality on TI dra7-evm (DRA7xx SoC)
> i've found that the most common problem I have to dial with is absence
> of corresponding PM callbacks in drivers and, in particular, noirq callbacks.
> So, I've fixed one driver first
> commit 6248015d6867 "ARM: omap-device: add missed callback for suspend-to-disk"
> but then found another one which need to be fixed too (omap_l3_noc.c).
> At this moment I decided to make my life easier and added new macro
> SET_NOIRQ_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS using the same approach as for the existing
> SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS macro.
> 
> SET_NOIRQ_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS: defined for CONFIG_PM_SLEEP and
> assigns ->suspend_noirq, ->freeze_noirq and ->poweroff_noirq to the same
> function. Vice versa happens for ->resume_noirq, ->thaw_noirq and
> ->restore_noirq.
> 
> Further two patches reuse this newly introduced macro.
> 
> SET_NOIRQ_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS, defined for CONFIG_PM_SLEEP, will
>     point ->suspend_noirq, ->freeze_noirq and ->poweroff_noirq to the same
>     function. Vice versa happens for ->resume_noirq, ->thaw_noirq and
>     ->restore_noirq.
> 
> Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx>
> Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@xxxxxxxxxx>

Looks ok to me.

Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx>

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/