Re: [PATCH] hwspinlock: qcom: Lock #7 is special lock, uses dynamic proc_id
From: Jeffrey Hugo
Date: Fri May 01 2015 - 13:27:28 EST
On 5/1/2015 11:06 AM, Lina Iyer wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/hwspinlock/qcom_hwspinlock.c b/drivers/hwspinlock/qcom_hwspinlock.c
index 93b62e0..043c62c 100644
--- a/drivers/hwspinlock/qcom_hwspinlock.c
+++ b/drivers/hwspinlock/qcom_hwspinlock.c
@@ -25,16 +25,26 @@
#include "hwspinlock_internal.h"
-#define QCOM_MUTEX_APPS_PROC_ID 1
-#define QCOM_MUTEX_NUM_LOCKS 32
+#define QCOM_MUTEX_APPS_PROC_ID 1
+#define QCOM_MUTEX_CPUIDLE_OFFSET 128
+#define QCOM_CPUIDLE_LOCK 7
+#define QCOM_MUTEX_NUM_LOCKS 32
+
This part of the diff doesn't look right. Why is it showing that
QCOM_MUTEX_APPS_PROC_ID and QCOM_MUTEX_NUM_LOCKS are deleted and added
lines? Shouldn't they be unchanged by this patch?
--
Jeffrey Hugo
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora
Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/