[PATCH 3.19 107/177] target/file: Fix BUG() when CONFIG_DEBUG_SG=y and DIF protection enabled
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Date: Sat May 02 2015 - 15:34:39 EST
3.19-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@xxxxxxxxx>
commit 38da0f49e8aa1649af397d53f88e163d0e60c058 upstream.
When CONFIG_DEBUG_SG=y and DIF protection support enabled, kernel
BUG()s are triggered due to the following two issues:
1) prot_sg is not initialized by sg_init_table().
When CONFIG_DEBUG_SG=y, scatterlist helpers check sg entry has a
correct magic value.
2) vmalloc'ed buffer is passed to sg_set_buf().
sg_set_buf() uses virt_to_page() to convert virtual address to struct
page, but it doesn't work with vmalloc address. vmalloc_to_page()
should be used instead. As prot_buf isn't usually too large, so
fix it by allocating prot_buf by kmalloc instead of vmalloc.
Signed-off-by: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Sagi Grimberg <sagig@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/target/target_core_file.c | 15 ++++++++-------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/target/target_core_file.c
+++ b/drivers/target/target_core_file.c
@@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ static int fd_do_prot_rw(struct se_cmd *
se_dev->prot_length;
if (!is_write) {
- fd_prot->prot_buf = vzalloc(prot_size);
+ fd_prot->prot_buf = kzalloc(prot_size, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!fd_prot->prot_buf) {
pr_err("Unable to allocate fd_prot->prot_buf\n");
return -ENOMEM;
@@ -286,9 +286,10 @@ static int fd_do_prot_rw(struct se_cmd *
fd_prot->prot_sg_nents, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!fd_prot->prot_sg) {
pr_err("Unable to allocate fd_prot->prot_sg\n");
- vfree(fd_prot->prot_buf);
+ kfree(fd_prot->prot_buf);
return -ENOMEM;
}
+ sg_init_table(fd_prot->prot_sg, fd_prot->prot_sg_nents);
size = prot_size;
for_each_sg(fd_prot->prot_sg, sg, fd_prot->prot_sg_nents, i) {
@@ -318,7 +319,7 @@ static int fd_do_prot_rw(struct se_cmd *
if (is_write || ret < 0) {
kfree(fd_prot->prot_sg);
- vfree(fd_prot->prot_buf);
+ kfree(fd_prot->prot_buf);
}
return ret;
@@ -653,11 +654,11 @@ fd_execute_rw(struct se_cmd *cmd, struct
0, fd_prot.prot_sg, 0);
if (rc) {
kfree(fd_prot.prot_sg);
- vfree(fd_prot.prot_buf);
+ kfree(fd_prot.prot_buf);
return rc;
}
kfree(fd_prot.prot_sg);
- vfree(fd_prot.prot_buf);
+ kfree(fd_prot.prot_buf);
}
} else {
memset(&fd_prot, 0, sizeof(struct fd_prot));
@@ -673,7 +674,7 @@ fd_execute_rw(struct se_cmd *cmd, struct
0, fd_prot.prot_sg, 0);
if (rc) {
kfree(fd_prot.prot_sg);
- vfree(fd_prot.prot_buf);
+ kfree(fd_prot.prot_buf);
return rc;
}
}
@@ -709,7 +710,7 @@ fd_execute_rw(struct se_cmd *cmd, struct
if (ret < 0) {
kfree(fd_prot.prot_sg);
- vfree(fd_prot.prot_buf);
+ kfree(fd_prot.prot_buf);
return TCM_LOGICAL_UNIT_COMMUNICATION_FAILURE;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/