[PATCH 4.0 024/220] mm/hugetlb: use pmd_page() in follow_huge_pmd()

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

4.0-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@xxxxxxxxxx>

commit 97534127012f0e396eddea4691f4c9b170aed74b upstream.

Commit 61f77eda9bbf ("mm/hugetlb: reduce arch dependent code around
follow_huge_*") broke follow_huge_pmd() on s390, where pmd and pte
layout differ and using pte_page() on a huge pmd will return wrong
results.  Using pmd_page() instead fixes this.

All architectures that were touched by that commit have pmd_page()
defined, so this should not break anything on other architectures.

Fixes: 61f77eda "mm/hugetlb: reduce arch dependent code around follow_huge_*"
Signed-off-by: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
 mm/hugetlb.c |    3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/mm/hugetlb.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -3735,8 +3735,7 @@ retry:
 	if (!pmd_huge(*pmd))
 		goto out;
 	if (pmd_present(*pmd)) {
-		page = pte_page(*(pte_t *)pmd) +
-			((address & ~PMD_MASK) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
+		page = pmd_page(*pmd) + ((address & ~PMD_MASK) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
 		if (flags & FOLL_GET)
 			get_page(page);
 	} else {


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/