[PATCH 0/1] signals: don't abuse __flush_signals() in selinux_bprm_committed_creds()
From: Oleg Nesterov
Date: Mon May 04 2015 - 12:46:28 EST
On 05/03, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> On 05/01, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
>
> > I also found a __flush_signals() use in:
> >
> > security/selinux/hooks.c
> >
> and I simply can't understand this code... but I feel that it can't
> be correct ;) Will try to re-read tomorrow.
Yes, this doesn't look right. Lets kill __flush_signals() first, there
are no other users.
And I am not sure it is fine to flush SIGSTOP... do we really want this?
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/